D700: An iconic dslr from Nikon.

I would like to share a short story with you. “Some time ago, I was at home. I walked towards my computer. Ethan, my cat crosses my way between my feet and made me stumbled. By instinct I reach out my hands to avoid hitting my face with the computer’s desk. At the same time, my right hand grabs the computer’s mouse clicking the “buy it now” botton on ebay… and just like that I purchased an old but trusty Nikon D700. It was a happy accident, if you will.”

Well, maybe the things didn’t happen that way. Is what I like to tell  myself to justify buying another camera for my collection. But the Nikon D700 is not just any random camera lacking merits worth to mention. It has earned itself a solid status and the respect of the “always perfectionist” photographers community. Released to the market in july of 2008,  it has been out there making images for over a decade. Proving to old photographers that the D700 still deserves a place in the camera’s field and it’s becoming with time a cult camera for newer photographers, whose are slowly learning that great photo quality is not exclusive of the most recent camera gear.

Nikon D700_

Since you can find detailed specs on the vast wisdom of the almighty Oracle (Google), I will mention just a few technisism here and there, just the ones that could be useful for you to consider the D700 as a viable purchase option in 2019.

Let’s explore this Nikon proposal from the past!

01) Price:

The trick for a good deal is when you feel like “you won” with the product that you buyed from someone else. That premise holds true if you get an excellent quality camera trading a fair amount of money in exchange. Today, you can find on Ebay D700’s bodies anywhere from $350 to $700 (priced at $2800/$3000 in 2008). I noticed the mark of $500 as the average price for the D700, but if you’re a pacient and search calmly, you may get away with a mint condition camera for less of the average price. In my case, I found a “mint condition” D700 for $400 with only 40.000 shutter actuactions. For a 150.000 rated shutter mechanism, literally at 40.000 actuactions, that shutter is barely warming up.

Great cameras like the D700 don’t drop in price because all the sudden they become useless artifacts. They low their economic value  because newer cameras arrives to the market. Newer technologies are more expensive to produce, as a result they are tagged higher in cost by the camera’s manufactors. Over time, years in technical upgrades and generations of newer cameras, transform high capable dslrs like the D700 in modern gems.

D700 review-2

Don’t let this 12 mp sensor fool you! There is plenty dynamic range in it. Even when the file sizes aren’t as big as the most recent cameras.

02) General features:

Ok, this is the “specs part” of the review. I’ll just mention a few of them. You can read them all here: D700 specs!

* Full frame 12.1 megapixels sensor (FX).

The D700 uses the same sensor found in the Nikon D3. For many of us and for the most of the photography’s aplications, 12 megapixels is more than enough. You could print photos as big as 20 x 30 inches in size and still get good quality.

* 51 autofocus points and 5 frames per second shooting speed.

Five frames per second was highly regarded in 2008. And even today is very decent high rate of shooting — of course, there are faster cameras suited for sports and action photography — but you can get 8 frames per second with the aditional vertical grip. Personally, I only use the center point of the viewfinder and then I recompose as needed. Since I don’t shoot “sports or action”, those features aren’t important to me. But it’s worth mention for you, maybe it’s something that you can look for in a dslr.

D700 review-3

The D700’s sensor it’s well known for the way it renders colors on skin tones.

* 200 to 6400 ISO (100 to 25600 expanded ISO values)

Well, if you’re considering the D700 for daylight photos, landscapes, studio use with speedlights, the high ISO’s maybe won’t matter that much to you. But if you are a nocturnal creature who takes photos with only the avaibable light; in the “High ISO department”, the D700 won’t dissapoint you neither. Being a full frame sensor with fewer megapixels, it means that the photocells are larger to capture more light than smaller sensors. That just means better low light performance. You can get away with useful images even at the 8000/10000 ISO mark. At 12.800 ISO, you still can get decent quality for small prints or web use. At 25.600 ISO, let’s just say “it’s there, it’s there”. I don’t want to start out a “polemic topic here”, but for what I’ve seen by personal experience, newer cameras with crop sensors (like the Fuji X-Pro2, for example) can match or even surpass the D700 in high ISO values (but not by much). Is not something negative. For a camera from 2008 that still delivers excellent high ISO files, it’s not a critique. It’s just a testament of how perfect this camera was back then and how great piece of gear it’s still today!

D700 review-8

A 8000 ISO example. In my humble opinion, it’s a totally usable picture.

*  Rugged magnesium-alloy construction with weather sealing.

The D700 it’s sturdy dslr. Well built and solid. That makes it heavy, though. It weigths almost one kilogram (950 grs or something). It has weather sealing, a nice feature to have especially if you live in a rainy country called Costa Rica. But hey! Protec your investment. No camera is 100% weatherproof against moisture or rain. It’s a plus feature that it’s there to help you to get away from the rain until you find some cover for your equipment. It’s not a magical shield against the elements. If you need to take photos under a torrential monsonic rainstorm, use common sense and cover your gear with a dslr’s plastic casing or an improved plastic bag.

* The shutter mechanism was desing to endure 150,000 cycles. 

The D700 has a tested 150.000 cycles shutter mechanism. It doesn’t mean that your D700 will die as soon as it’s takes the 150.000th photograph. It’s just an expectation of how much the shutter could last. Some D700’s owners out there are reporting that their cameras had taken as much as 180.000, 200.000 or even more shutter actuactions. Nikon truly designed the D700 to endure. But regardless of that, if you can find a camera with a low shutter count, it will be a happier day for you!

thumbnail_IMG_6908

The D700’s viewfinder covers only 95% of the frame. In practice, it doesn’t affect composition “that much”. That crappy photo doesn’t makes justice to the real experience of gazing through the D700’s viewfinder.

Nikon D700_-2

The D700’s back button layout is easy and intuitive. The Arenal Volcano far in the distance.

03) Image quality:

Did I already mention that the D700 shares the same sensor found in the Nikon D3?? Oh, yes. I did it. The color tonalities coming out of that “humble 12 megapixels sensor” are simply beautiful. You really are getting premium image quality for a bargain price, it doesn’t matter if that image is only 12 megapixels. Quality don’t care about megapixels. If you use a nice prime lens and compare photos between old and modern Nikon’s, to the naked eye probably no one could guess wich photo it’s from a 10+ years old D700 and wich one is from the D850.

Don’t get me wrong! I’m not against many megapixels in the camera’s sensor. The advance in technology has allow to achieve more “millions of pixels count” in every newer camera model since the begining of the digital photography. It’s actually an expected and logical evolution. But in the practical reality, 12 megapixels are more than enough for websites and social media aplications and even for decent size prints. Ask yourself: Do I print my images? How often and how big I print??  If you’re not printing, well… Then you should! At least make a small selection of photos and bring them to this tactile and visual reality of yours.

Quick tips!

D700 review-7

The D700’s will give you nice colors even under artificial lights.

D700 review-6

Since this camera is not afraid to the high ISO’s, you can document life without needing a flash.

04) 8K video recording at 240 fps!:

 Just kidding! This classic modern gem came from an era prior to the video capabilities in the dslr world.

I’ll try to keep this post simple. As a resume: 1) Fairly low price for a workhorse camera. 2) You get a highly capable dslr with a lot of features. 3) Great FX image quality. What else can you ask for?!

D700 review-4

Remember, back in 2008 the camera sensors without “low pass filter” were considered science fiction. Nevertheless, match the D700 with a prime lens and you will see sharp results.

But is it the D700 for you??  

Simple. The D700 will cover most of the photographic situations that you can think of. The rugged built and image quality it’s there! Besides, it’s quite a bargain this days. If you care about video, then forget it. This camera was designed when the dslr’s were for stills, only. If you “constantly need to crop your photos”, then a D800, D810, D850…. or even a 24 megapixels DX camera to “get the most out your focal milimeters” will be a better option for you. If “video or cropping” is not the case, don’t hesitate to get your own D700 as soon as you can!

D700 review-9

D700 review-5

The D700’s tonalities won’t disappoint you. Is the same sensor found in the Nikon’s flagship D3. That should tell you something!

Conclusion:

For the things I’ve seen and the experience I have now by using different cameras and brands, if I was just about to purchased my first dslr ever, then I would buy a Nikon D700 over an expensive “entry level modern Nikon”. You get more built quality and a finest equipment for just a fraction of the cost. Then I would use the rest of the money to get a couple of beautiful prime lenses. But hey, it’s just me. In fact, the D700 is such a garbain camera nowdays, that I got a second body in great condition for just $350! Apart from my Nikon FE, the D700 it’s the only camera model that made me feel that a second unit (as a “back up” or call it whatever you want), “it’s a must have”. I’m not the wisest man on the earth, but I know that you only live once and life itself is quite short. So, don’t die wanting put your hands around a camera that you have admired for years. Treat yourself with an iconic camera.

Thanks for reading!

Advertisements

Saal Digital Photobook overview

Disclaimer: I’m not been paid or sponsored by Saal Digital. The opinions of this publication are my own thoughts about their service as a tangible product.

This is a short overview about my experience with three photo books that I ordered from Saal Digital company. As far as I know, Saal Digital it’s a company based in Germany, but they are printing in different countries by now. In my case, the photo books that I own were printed by Saal Digital in the United States.
Of course there are a lot of companies to choose from if you want to print your photographs. In honor to the truth, I haven’t printed photos from other companies to have a parameter of comparison. But if you search opinions out there and reviews, you’ll fiind a lot of satisfaced costumers giving to you their opinion about Saal. Now I’m one of them.

SD overview

Here’s why. 01) Intuitive and easy to use software. You just download it in your computer and in no time you’ll be ready to sent your first photo book for printing.

02) They work fast! Once you pay for your product, the software uploads your photos for printing. Usually, your new photobook will take 2 to 4 days to arrive.

saal

It’s easy to personalize and organize your photo books.

03) Materials and printing quality:
The photographic paper that they use has a fair thickness to it. It doesn’t feel to fragile, but neither too thick to add excessive weight to your album. Just the right amount.

SD overview-3

I ordered matte finish paper in the pages with the internal photos and also in the cover and back cover. It may be hard to tell the difference in you look the photos from your cellphone/computer´s screen, but there is a difference with the cover and the internal photos. The cover exterior photos are “true matte finish”. However, the internal photos have a layer with a “slightly glossy finish”. It’s not a deal breaker by any mean, it’s like a 90% “matte”, but take it in consideration. If you order glossy finish, it will cost you a few more dollars. I prefer matte finish anyway.

SD overview-4

As far as image quality, well, it will depends how big your files are. The software will tell you if your photo lacks quality. Let’s say you upload a small sized jpg. The software it’s going to indicates you if that specific image is poor for printing. Pay attention to it!
The prints that I received looks like exactly as I edited. Even when my computer’s monitor is not “profesionally calibrated”, the colors match!

SD overview-6

The only noticeable difference that I can tell is in the photos taken at night. Especially the sky, I noticed that it’s 1/2 stop darker compared to the digital image. But hey! Nothing worthy to lose your temper. As I said, my computer´s monitor is not calibrated. It may be just that!

SD overview-7

SD overview-2

As you can see in the this photo, the fingerprints and other substances can be seen in the external photos in you choose “matte finish”. If that could bother you, you may want to choose glossy finish in the cover and back cover. Just a thought!

04) Print! Just print!
Images are meant to be seen in a physical form. They just are! Take some time to select at least your favorite photographs and create a few photo books to share them with the people you care about. It’s totally worth it. It doesn’t matter wich camera system you use or wich printing company you choose, as long as you smile staring at your printed passion. Go for it!

Thanks for reading!

Shame

Cinestill 800025

You’re gonna walk on home. You’re gonna walk alone. You’re gonna see this through. Don’t let them get to you. 

Cinestill 800033

Love is good and love is kind. Love is drunk and love is blind. Love is good and love is mine. Love is drunk all the time.

Cinestill 800028

You’re gonna walk on home. You’re gonna walk alone. You’re gonna walk so far. You’re gonna wonder who you are.

Cinestill 800034

Love is good and love is kind. Love is good and love is blind. Love is good and love is mine.  Love is good all the time.

Cinestill 800027

Hello, goodbye, you know you made us cry. Hello, goodbye, you know you made us cry. Hello, goodbye, you know you made us cry. Hello, goodbye, you know you made us cry …

* Late 2016. Lyrics: “Shame” by The Smashing Pumpkins. Walking home on a foggy night with my Nikon FE loaded with some Cinestill 800 film on it. Falling in love with a girl that a few months later broke my heart until today.

Thanks for reading!

Fuji X-T1: The best way to begin with mirrorless cameras.

Who hasn’t heard about the “mirrorless revolution”? It’s not a novelty, but even when mirrorless cameras has been in the market for a while now, it was until 2018 that I began to play with those little modern machines. Yes, photography is an addictive hobby.

I heard from Fuji a few years ago. My curiosity drove me to search for a small camera  that was able to take RAW photos (You know, for the Raw files flexibility). That’s when I saw the Fuji’s proposal about rangefinder style cameras — The X100, actually –. But back then, the price was out my budget. Nevertheless, the whole Fuji concept was interesting and apealing to me. Since then, I have been following new models and learning towards the X-Series system.

The years went by. So, camera models that once were expensive, all of the sudden are out there for you to reach. That was my case with the X-T1 . The first generation “slr” type mirrorless from Fujifilm. You can find those beautiful suckers from $250 to $450 on Ebay. The average price will be $350. I paid $330 in 2018 for my X-T1. It’s the graphite silver version, but there is a black version also if you prefer a discreet profile.

Fxt1-3

Leaving technical data aside, these are valid arguments to consider a Fuji X-T1:

  • The price drop! Since there are two newer versions of the XT Series (X-T2 & X-T3), the price of the X-T1 it’s a bargain!
  • General camera features: Small size, light weight, metal housing, weather sealed, very decent and crisp viewfinder, beautiful looking camera.
  • Image quality:  I know it may sound weird, but the first generation 16 megapixel sensor of the X-T1’s has certain magic. It renders beautiful files with pleasant colors.
  • Lenses flexibility: Different from the X100 series, the XT series were designed to be used with interchangeable lens. You can choose between Fuji lenses or third party lenses with adaptaders. For example, with a $2 adapter, I can use my Nikon/Pentax/M42’s vintage lenses with the Fuji system. You can use lenses with aperture ring, only.
  • Camera layout: All the adjustments previous to take the photo, are made with physical knobs. It’s a nice tactile experience that makes photoghapy fun.
  • Tiltable screen: For low or high level shoots. Personally, I often forget this feature and I don’t use the tiltable screen.
  • Wifi connection: For easy sharing your photos with friends or social networks, if that is your thing.
Fxt1-2

You can choose to set the adjustments manually or leave it on “Auto” if you are in a hurry or feeling lazy.

There is not such a thing as a “perfect camera”. The high ISO values in the X-T1 are great and more than adecuate for all around use. But the higher ISO setting that you can use is 6400 (if you shoot RAW), it is possible to use 12.800 ISO, but only in JPG format. Take note!  Well, is not a secret. The battery charge it’s very short, at least if you compared to your all week charged d-slr. But it’s not an exclusive “X-T1´s thing”. The battery charge is a topic related to all the Fuji’s in general. The electronic viewfinder (EVF) cosumes a lot of power from the battery. If you’re considering a mirrorless camera, buy a few spare batteries as soon as you can. You’re going to need them.

X-T1´s Samples:

_RBM2969

_RBM2981

15 julio 2018 07

24 Junio 2018 04 (1 of 1)

a4305381-41b0-4dbf-99af-fde2531a0094

Fxt1-5

6400 ISO.

Unedited raw

Fuji RAF (Raw file) unedited.

f34a50dc-20d2-47af-91fb-0306cbb98576

Small, yet beautiful and capable camera!

As I said before, there’s is not a perfect camera. But the X-T1 is a special camera indeed. I dare to blindly recommend the X-T1 to anyone who wants to give mirrorless cameras a try, or even if you´re looking to buy your first camera. You’ll get a camera that’s able to create stunning images in small and elegant body. Give it a try! You’ll thank me later.

Best regards!

Pentax K5 IIs: Why not!?

This is not a review. Let’s say it’s just an overview, I know it’s an old date camera model and it won’t be a consideration for the vast mayority of people today. So, it won’t be a “specs thecnical” overview. There are plenty of web charts out there for specifications.

This are just my thoughts about the K5 IIs. I’ve always felt curious about the Pentax d-slrs since I saw the original K5 on reviews on YouTube, a few years ago. Since I already have a couple of vintage Pentax lenses, I thought it was a good idea to check the current selling prices on Ebay.  You can find the K5 IIs from $245 to $400, being the average price of $350 for the body only.

Pentax Rev-2In my case, I was lucky to came across with this K5 IIs in excellent condition. The camera had a bundle of a Pentax 16-50mm lens and a humble 50-200mm lens, also with 3 batteries and charger. All that for $550! It was no brainer!

The K5 and K5 II shares a 16 megapixels sensor. Plenty enough for web use and printing. Of course, I was tempted to buy the K3, with a 24 megapixels sensor. But basically I got an already great camera with two lenses, for the average price of a K3 body.

When I got the camera, my suspicious were confirmed! The Pentax brand is so UNDER RATED! Well, at least it always has been my impression. Pentax, as a brand, truly deserve to be consider more seriously. The build quality of the camera is top notch, it’s relative small for a D-slr system,  their lenses produce great results and the Pentax raw’s ( called .PEF ) performs excellent in dynamic range and very decent in high ISO’s values.

Also worth notice, many of the Pentax cameras have weathersealing, in camera “shake reduction” and many of their lenses (WR designation ) have sealing gaskets.

13 enero 2019_-10

Some mist won’t hurt this rugged workhorse!

Being objective, I have to tell you that I found the Pentax´s menu “weird”, what I mean it’s not as nice looking as the menus that you´ll find on the Nikons, Canons, Fujis, etc. But it’s not a complicated menu, at least!

Pentax Rev-3

Size comparation: The Pentax K5 IIs and Nikon D500

25-26 dic 18_-8

Great dynamic range: You can shoot against the sun and be able to recover detail and color from the shadows.

Here are a few samples from a camping trip to the Turrialba’s Volcano, here in the tropical Costa Rica:

Cartago Pentax-4

Cartago Pentax-6

Cartago Fuji-3

Cartago Pentax-13

Panorama of the Turrialbal’s volcano. Early in the morning.

My curiosity for the Pentax system never left my mind. And i’m glad it never did! Taking in consideration the current prices of many excellent Pentax models (K5’s, K3’s), you could spent a small amount of money (compared to newer cameras) and get yourself a trusty and solid camera for use many years to come.

So, Pentax! Why the hell not!?? 

Thanks for your time to reading this lines.

 

 

Nikon D800: Is it worth to get one in 2019?

I´ll let you know from the start. This is not a “technical oriented review” of the D800. Of course, I’ll mention some specifications later on to help you to consider if this camera from 2012 is still a valid candidate by the date you read this lines. But if you want to memorize by heart the D800 specifications, you can find a far more comprehensive review in someone else’s web site.

Thanks for your consideration.

 

The Nikon D800 was announced on February of 2012 and hit the market on March of 2012. It was the start of “the Nikon’s D800 breed line-up”. The Nikon D800E followed it a few weeks later. Today, you can choose to buy the D800/D800E, D810 or the newly released D850.

My personal reasons to buy the D800 over other cameras:

*Full frame sensor (yeah, my first “digital full frame”) Nikon calls it FX.

*100% viewfinder coverage. A 96/98% viewfinder is not a deal-breaker, but having a 100% coverage is even better.

*Image quality. The superb dynamic range that you can get out of the NEF raw files from Nikon is stunning! Of course, a 36.3 megapixels file helps to store lots of data.

*Great low light performance at high ISO values. A welcome feature if you shoot at night with only available light (like often I do). The D800 can hold up the noise very well, even when it has a high megapixel count.

* Minus 2EV focusing: Talking about low light. The Nikon D800 can achieve to lock focus on subjects in -2EV. Another useful feature if you shoot with available light.

*A tough magnesium covered body with weather sealing. It doesn’t mean that you can take the camera and submerged under water. But it should be able to withstand light rain for an “intellect/logical short period of time”.  Your camera, even if is one “cheap one” is an investment and a precision instrument, so you should always take care of it properly. The “weather sealing” feature is there, it’s a plus. But give yourself and your camera a favor and don’t rely a 100% on it.  Always use common sense, so you can enjoy your gear for years to come. If you’re a sponsored professional by any major brand, ignore this.

*Nikkor lenses: I already had a Nikon D7000 (DX) and few Nikon film cameras. Because of that, I have a few lenses stored here and there. If you’re a Nikon user already, you can take advantage of using your glass, even if you’re upgrading from DX (crop sensor) to FX (full frame), the Nikon D800 can use the DX lenses (giving you 15 megapixels files). Although, in that case, you should consider AI/AI-s lenses (manual only) or the D series lenses from Nikon (with autofocus) so you can use and take the benefits of the full frame goodness! Vintage lenses from Nikon can be purchased at reasonable prices on Ebay and they’ll give you back great image quality.

D800 R04 (1 of 1)

 

Lacking features in the D800 (but I don’t need anyway)

*51 autofocus points: Ok, wait…. This feature is actually a great one!! But I always use the main center point to lock focus and then I recompose the frame as I need it. Using film cameras conditioning me that way, I guess. But if you rely in the modern Nikon’s cameras autofocus, then you should be fine with the D800.

* Only 4 frames per second! That is not the end of the world as we know it. Personally, I don’t shoot sports or fast phase subjects/objects. But even if I need it to. I’m sure that I could “capture the moment” in short burst of 3 to 4 seconds. And yes, with only 4 frames per second. It may be difficult, but not impossible. In other scenario, if you shoot sports or some sort of action photography (especially if photography is your income), then you should consider any other model of camera, no matter which brand you choose. It must be a perfect camera for you out there.

Other Considerations.

Camera layout

If you ever used a film Nikon F100 or the digital D700, you’ll be at home with the D800 buttons and control layout. If you’re upgrading from Nikon’s DX cameras, you may get confused from time to time searching for the ISO button, etc, but soon you’ll get used to it. As expected, if you are coming from a different camera system (let’s say “Pentax”), you’ll find a learning curve for a period of time, but nothing difficult to master.

It may be just my point of view, but I prefer the movie record button on the back of the camera next to screen (like the D7000). I think it’s more an intuitive placement for that setting than the upper camera button located next to shutter button of the D800. But again, you’ll get used to it.

 

Video settings.

Today, 4K video and fast frame per second video capabilities are the standard. If you’re looking for 4K video, the D800 is not the camera to go. Nevertheless, it can shoot at 1080p video and 720p. If you choose the 720p, you can shoot at 60 frames per second, the basic setting for slow motion video (at least for walking persons – not for fast moving objects). Of course, 4K is great. But you can always get away with stunning results using 1080p or 720p. It’s all on your vision and creativity, anyway.

 

Image quality.

Well, there is not too much to say here. It’s a full frame sensor with 36.3 megapixels and a decent high ISO performance (regardless the high megapixels density). Besides, you can count on Nikon’s great dynamic range image quality (if you use NEF raw files). The auto white balance gives you accurate tonalities under most shooting scenarios. I have found that my D800 exposes correctly at least 98% of the photos. But it will overexposed 1/3 of a stop if you use old manual AI/AI-s lenses. Matrix metering can’t be achieved if you use vintage lenses. Take notes of that if you’re using manual lenses with your D800 or any other modern D-slr.

 

D800 R05 (1 of 1)

RAW NEF file converted to Jpg.

36.3 Megapixels.

36 megapixels was a lot of data in the year 2012 and still is in 2018. In a couple of years, it will be the standard of pixel density (at least for a while). Every year, even the “entry level dslrs” increase the megapixels count (12 mp, 16 mp, 20 mp, 24 mp…. Can you see the pattern?)  Most of us never print our photos “as big as our hearts would like”. But having those kick ass files “just in case” it’s a welcome feature. If you don’t need 36 megapixels, you can always look for a D600/D610. Those cameras have 24 megapixels sensors in a more compact size than the D800. If you don’t need such a high megapixels count and you can live in peace without having the video feature in your dslr, then I invite you to learn a little about the Nikon D700: a truly modern gem!

 

Battery Life:

The D800 uses the EN-EL-15 battery, the same used in the D7000, D600, D610, etc. If you already own a few spare batteries, keep them! If you only have the one that it came with the camera, you’ll have to buy 2 or more batteries (a “must buy” if you’re going out for the weekend) The D800 it’s going to eat up the battery fast. Especially if you record video. Let’s say the D800 would drain the battery 30% faster than the Nikon D7000, approximately.

D800 R00 (1 of 1)

D800 R03 (1 of 1)

Who’s the Nikon D800 designed for??

The D800 was designed for studio photographers (portraits, food, products) and for landscape photographers. But it’s suitable for travel (if you don’t mind it’s size) and I dare to say that you can use it for photojournalism, if you don’t care about it´s slow rate of 4 frames per second.  Though, if you want to travel light, you may be interested in the Fuji X series cameras. A personal project that I hope to achieve in this year. I promise to you, I’m going to write about my experiences with the Fuji X series in a near future.

Even when the D800’s autofocus capabilities are suitable for fast tracking, the slow 4 frame per second rate won’t make this camera a top choice for sports or fast moving subjects in photography. Don’t get me wrong. You can still take great sports photos with it, but the D800 is not the perfect tool designed for that purpose in the photography realm. If you’re a sport photographer, you already know that.

D800 R05 (1 of 1)

D800 R06 (1 of 1)

Should I get one D800 in 2018/2019??

Consider this:

Back then in 2012, the D800 cost $2999 (body only). Today, after the release of the Nikon D810 and D850 later on, the D800 can be found on Ebay at $1200 or less. And guess what?? As the time goes by, the price is going to get cheaper. The D810 is out there as a valid option as well. It features a newer processor and slightly improved high ISO image quality, but it’s going to cost you a few hundred dollars more. You can use that extra money to buy lenses or accessories for the D800. Featuring the same sensor, the image quality between both models won’t be perceptible for the naked eye, anyway. The D800 was a revolutionary d-slr when it first came out to the market. Newer camera models are a natural and expected evolution in technology, but they won’t take away the D800’s merits. The Nikon D800 was in 2012, and still is a superb camera. It’s able to capture stunning images and video for a fraction of the cost of the D850. If you’re considering a full frame camera packed with a lot features and for a low cost, the D800 is the way to go.

More sample photos:

D800 R07 (1 of 1)

29 Marzo 2018 09 (1 of 1)

Summer bonfire with my friends

29 Marzo 2018 13 (1 of 1)

Focusing in low light and using high ISO?? No problem for the D800!

Those were my personal considerations to buy a D800 as my primary camera (in the year 2017). But I don’t make my living from photography. I’m just a hobbyist who likes to write is this blog to kill boredom. Your opinions or actual needs in the photography field, may differ from mine. In any case, I hope this information may help you to make a valid choice.

Thanks for reading!

Cerro de La Muerte (II parte)

A year later, I went back to the Costa Rica’s second highest mountain to spend one night camping out in the summer sky. This time, I was prepared to withstand the cold temperatures that the night brings ( if you’re at 3300 meters above sea level ).

Now I know that you have to “wear a layering system” instead one single heavy coat. The layering system it’s versatile and it’s truly funtional.

03 Marzo 2018 01 (1 of 1)

We arrive in the afternoon to find the camping spot submerged in heavy fog. No need to worry — I said to my friend Jason (in the photo) — I know the fog it’s gonna fade away before nightfall.

03 Marzo 2018 03 (1 of 1)

Luckily, I was right. The fog began to fade slowly, revealing a rewarding summer sky.

03 Marzo 2018 05 (1 of 1)

At this altitude, either dusk or dawn, will gift you impressive views.

03 Marzo 2018 13 (1 of 1)

03 Marzo 2018 06 (1 of 1)

Before the moon was out.

03 Marzo 2018 07 (1 of 1)

After the moon came out. There is not “technical climbing” to summit. A national roadway called “Carretera Interamericana”, pass near to the highest hill of the mountain. Easily you can park your vehicle beside your camping tent.

03 Marzo 2018 09 (1 of 1)

Since I couldn’t sleep, I went out to take photos under the moonlight. I wanted to test “the layering system”, anyway. 

03 Marzo 2018 12-2 (1 of 1)

Up in the summit. It’s only gonna take 5 minutes walking in a trail to get you there. Down below, the camping spot, just a few meters away from “Carretera Interamericana” national roadway.

03 Marzo 2018 08 (1 of 1)

Surrounding hills. Almost before dawn.

I know I’ll come back to el Cerro de la Muerte (Death’s Mountain). Contrary to many, I enjoy being miserable at cold temperatures in a mountain instead the abrasive heat of the beaches. Even if  you can’t sleep, being out under the stars makes your soul and thoughts humble. It’s a place to find yourself.

 

Thanks for reading!